|
| Spanish |
| German |
| French |
| Russian |
There are two kinds of slavery. The old version where the body was in chains but the mind was free and the new - far more dangerous - where the body is pampered but the mind is chained by a constant deluge of false information.
Every propagandist knows the value of repetition. It is the constant drip of raindrops that eventually soaks the ground.
"After having thus taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate to rise above the crowd.""The will of man is not shattered but softened, bent and guided. Man is seldom forced by it to act but is constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence. It does not tyrannise but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes and stupefies a people. Each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals of which the government is the shepherd."
From Alexis de Tocqueville (Alexis Charles Henri Maurice Cleret, le Comte de Tocqueville - (1805-1859) French historian.
With the above quote in mind, the fact that 96% of news WORLDWIDE is under the control of six Jewish corporations should arouse a modicum of concern.
"The propagandist proceeds on the sound principle that the magnititude of a lie always contains certain factors of credibility. Therefore something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick and the longer the tocsins remain in the national body the more they become an ingredient of it, and after a certain time unquestionably harmful poisons will be regarded as an ingredient of one's own nation or at best will be tolerated as a necessary evil."
From "Mein Kampf" by Adolf Hitler
Perhaps no better example of the truth of the above is the Hitler/Nazi/Holocaust myth. Why is the Holocaust rammed down everyone's throat everywhere? Between 1989 and 2003 alone more than 170 films with Holocaust themes were made and in many American and European schools and in all Israeli classrooms the focus on the war-time sufferings of Europe's Jews is obligatory.
It is brandished like a banner to take attention from the Jewish attack on the people of Gaza. It is resurrected every time there is a need to play on sentiment. It is repeated like a mantra over and over until the people listening believe without question the truth of the myth.
In some countries special "Holocaust Denial" laws stifle any objective discussion of the Holocaust issue. In Israel, France, Germany, Austria and a few other nations it is a crime publically to play down, dispute, whitewash or deny the Holocaust. No other chapter of history is protected by law in this way even factually accurate statements that violate Holocaust Denial laws are punished. Over the years many individuals in those countries have been fined, imprisoned or forced into exile by disputing Holocaust claims.
Jewish death and suffering do not deserve to be venerated more than the death and suffering of non-Jews. The Holocaust remembrance campaign deserves scorn not support because it is a one-sided effort which serves narrow Jewish and Israeli interests and bolsters Jewish Zionist power. A hammer has been placed in their hands to batter out all and any criticism and most certainly to sweep away the truth.
Even the Jewish director of the Remarque Institute at New York University Tony Judt says:
"The Shoa (the Hebrew term for the Holocaust) is frequently exploited in America and Israel to deflect and forbid any criticism of Israel. Indeed the Holocaust of Europe's Jews is nowadays exploited thrice over. It gives American Jews a particular retrospective victim identity. It allows Israel to trump any other nation's suffering and justify its own excesses with the claim that the Jewish catastrophe was unique and incomparable and, in contradiction to the first two, it is adduced as an all-purpose metaphor for evil, anywhere, everywhere and always and taught to schoolchildren all over America and Europe without any reference to context or cause. This modern instrumentalisation of the Holocaust for political advantage is ethically disreputable and politically imprudent."
While the Holocaust drum is thumped incessantly little or nothing is ever heard of the other people who suffered during the war. The non-Jewish victims of Soviet Russia's dictator Joseph Stalin, himself a Jew, greatly outnumber even the exaggerated figures of the Jews who were supposed to have perished as a result of Hitler's policies.
Robert Conquest, a prominent scholar of twentieth century Russian history, estimates that the numbers of those who lost their lives as a consequence of Stalin's policy are no fewer than 20 million. Authoritative estimates of the number of Chinese who perished as a result of killings, repression, starvation and forced labour under the Communist regime of Mao Zedong range between 30 and 60 million. During the years 1885 through to 1908 an estimated 5 to 8 million Africans perished in the Congo.
Why did millions of fine young men from both sides die?
Was it because the rising power of Hitler's Germany offered a threat to the Jewish plan of world dominion? Hitler's expressed target was to increase the boundaries of Germany created as a result of the Treaty of Versailles, remove the stranglehold of the Money Power and to attack Bolchevik Russia - i.e. Russian under Jewish control. He failed. Was his failure due to the fact he did not realise the extent to which the tentacles of the Leviathan of financial control had penetrated into most nations and were in fact backing him? Or was he acting from the beginning under their instructions?
In April 1945 Adolf Hitler said: "It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling First World War there would ever be a second against either England or America."
Hitler made many overtures to England for peace knowing that there was a strong party in England sympathetic to Germany, culminating in the brave solo flight by Rudolf Hess. The attempt failed and ended in the arrest and subsequent imprisonment of Hess for 40 years (although whether the solitary prisoner in Spandau really was Hess is questionable.) It was through Hitler's direct orders that the British Army caught at Dunkirk was allowed to escape from the coast of France although Winston Churchill claimed the credit for himself. Winston Churchill's enthusiasm for the destruction of Germany had nothing to do with patriotism or of concern for Poland but was a fulfilment of his role as agent of the Money Power.
Every effort has been made to paint Hitler as some mad ogre and the Nazis as the epitome of bestiality by those who control the news. Yet in August 1918 Hitler received the Iron Cross, First Class, a rare achievement for a corporal from the German High Command not given to handing out decorations ad lib.
As soon as Hitler gained power, the Jewish propaganda machine was cranked up and operated full blast. The following headlines appeared in the Daily Express:
"Judia Declares war on Germany. Jews of the world unite. Boycott of Germany goods. Mass Demonstrations." March 24 1933.Again "the Israeli people around the world declare economic financial war against Germany. 14 million Jews stand together as one man to declare war against Germany. "
Samuel Undermeyer in a radio broadcast on WABC in New York August 6 1933: "Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike who is not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now ..." Joining with Samuel Untermeyer was Bernard Baruch at the same time promoting preparations for war against Germany.
"I emphasise that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce both in volume and profit." Samuel Untermeyer was a " German" Jewish leader and close friend of Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt.
"War in Europe in 1934 was inevitable" - H. Morgenthau Secretary of the US Treasury.
"Hitler will have no war . He does not want war. But we will force it on him. Not this year but soon." Emil Ludwig Cohn in June 1934.
"We Jews are going to bring war on Germany" - David A. Brown National Chairman United Jewish Campaign 1934.
Lord Beaverbrook:"We want to bring out a deep hatred for the Germans, German soldiers, sailors and airmen. We must hate until we win."
On 3 June 1938 the American Hebrew boasted that "they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France and that these "three sons of Israel" will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell." Joseph Trimble.
"The Second World War is being fought for the defence for the fundamentals of Judaism." October 8th 1942, Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn in the Chicago Sentinel.
:"The Jew today is the great agitator for the complete destruction of Germany. ... If our people and our state become the victim of these bloodthirsty and vicious tyrants of nations the whole earth will sink into the sphere of this octopus. If Germany frees herself from this embrace this greatest of dangers for all nations may be regarded as broken for the whole world."
"In England as well as in Italy the cleavage between the views of the better indigenous statesmen and the will of the world stock exchange Jews is clear.""Fate by handing Russia to Bolchevism, robbed the Russian nation of that intelligencia that previously brought about and guaranteed its existence as a state..... Today it can be regarded as almost totally exterminated and extinguished. It has been replaced by the Jew...."
... "If you want to destroy a people or even a person what do you do first? Degrade the moral sense, the sense of all human beings, crooks included, admire courage, strength and moral rectitude even when trying to destroy it. So in order to destroy, these are the things that you aim for. Cause degeneration of the strong and the brave by luxury, by excessive riches and, at the moment, racism . It is perfectly natural that people firstly are loyal to their family and then to their nation. The nation to which they belong and the nation with which they share a cultural heritage. "
"Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key to comprehend the inner and consequently the real aims of social democracy. ."
..." The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of nature ... thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. "
"A fact that was no doubt recognised by those who prepared the agenda of the Protocols of Zion and its emphasis on removing the aristocracy of nations.... The state is a national organism and not an economic organisation. "
"People who sneak into the rest of mankind like drones to make other men work for them under all sorts of pretexts can form states even without any definite delimited living space of their own . This applies first and foremost to a people under whose parasitism the whole of honest humanity is suffering today, more than ever the Jews. ... "
"Unfortunately those in power ... chose ... the lunacy of world economic conquest. The result was ...industrialisation. The first consequence was the weakening of the peasant class. Proportionately as the peasant class diminished. The mass of the big city proloteriat increased....As economic life became the dominant mistress of the state, money became the God who all had to serve. ... It was clear that .... the aristocracy of the sword would in a short time inevitably be overshadowed by the financial aristocracy."
" Culturally he contaminates art, literature, the theatre, makes a mockery of natural feeling, overthrows all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good and instead drags men down ... Religion is ridiculed, ethics and morality are represented as out-moded until the last props of a nation in its struggle for existence have fallen. "
"The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where about 30 million people were killed or starved with positively fanatical savagery. ... in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits control of a great people."
Hitler's Germany was defeated first and foremost by the Soviet Union. Some 70 -80 per cent of German combat forces were destroyed by the Soviet military on the eastern front.
The nations sitting in judgement at Nuremberg have so clearly proclaimed themselves exempt from the war they have administered. An important feature of this sanitized belief is the view that whereas the Nazi regime was responsible for many war crimes the Allies and especially the United States waged war humanely. In fact the record of Allied misdeeds is a long one. The British/American bombing of German cities, the terrorist campaign that took the lives of more than half a million civilians. Genocidical ethnic cleansing of millions in eastern and central Europe, the large scale mistreatment of German prisoners. Shortly after the war Germany's leaders were put on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity. (in truth what they were being charged with was the temerity to challenge the Jewish Leviathan.)
At the conclusion of the Nuremberg Trial of 1945 the British weekly, the "Economist", cited Soviet crime and said:" Among the crimes against humanity stands the offence of indiscriminate bombing and also includes the mass expulsion of populations. Can the leaders who at Potsdam condoned the expulsion of millions of Germans from their homes hold themselves completely innocent?
Тhe Holocaust then came into its own.
It is time that a proper place should be given for the sufferings of the Russian people under the Communist rule. It is time that notice should be given that the Bolchevik Revolution purportedly communist was actually funded by the Jewish Capitalist bankers. In other words both the two supposedly contradictory ideas were represented by the same people. They were both Jewish.
The devilish subtlety of the whole Hitler/Holocaust business is barely recognised even now. There is little doubt that Hitler's opinions and actions accorded well with the plans of the Jewish international bankers. How far were their fingers enmeshed? What exactly was the role of Professor Haushofer, whose ideas certainly influenced him? It should be remembered that Haushofer had a Jewish wife and it may well have been his son Albert, the "friend" of Rudolf Hess who betrayed him to the Allies?
The use of "agents", either innocent of the role they were playing or lured by the desire of power, has many times been the method employed. Hjalmar Schacht the president of the Reischsbank, in 1923 before Hitler's entry into the drama proposed the formation of the Bank of International Settlements, supposedly intended to deal with the payments due from Germany after the First World War but that had a far more important role, in preparation for World War II, to supply a conduit whereby funds during hostilities could be channelled between the opposing sides. (for more information. It was to be a Bank to control all other central banks, controlled in its turn by the Rothschilds, who also happened to control I.G. Farben, the arms manufacturer, that operated the famous Auschwitz concentration camp.
Nothing of what happened occurred by chance, the suffering and death of millions of innocent people was of no consequence except as a means to an end. The implication of the Bush/ Harriman family, Fritz Thyssen, the Union Banking Corporation, the Vereinigte Stahlwerke (United Steel Works Corporation or German Steel Trust) that produced a considerable proportion of Nazi Germany's heavy industry and had been organised by Clarence Dillon. W, A. Harriman & Co. merged with the British-American investment house, Brown Brothers in 1931. Montagu Norman, a former Brown Brothers partner, whose grandfather had been head of Brown Brothers during the U.S. Civil War, and now virtual dictator of world finance as Bank of England Governor, was an avid supporter of Hitler.
Friederich Flick the major co-owner of the German Steel Trust with Fritz Thyssen was one of the leading financiers and industrialists who contributed large sums to the Nazi Party. Montagu Norman's protegé, Hjalmar Schacht with Friederich Flick played a pivotal role in Hitler's assumption to power, while Baron Rudolph von Schroeder, vice president of Hamburg-Amerika Line also had intimate contact with Averell Harriman in Germany. Many and varied were the fingers in the pie.
On March 3l, 1933, the American-Jewish Committee, controlled by the Warburgs, and the B'nai B'rith, heavily influenced by the Sulzbergers (New York Times) issued a formal joint statement of the two organisations, that no American boycott against Germany should be encouraged and advising that no further mass meetings be held or similar forms of agitation be employed.
A tale of incredible duplicity, macabre in intent. Against which must be asked the question again : was Hitler saint or sinner? Was he a willing protaganist? Or was he duped into playing the role he did?